Dragon Soop Blue Raspberry Caffeinated Alcoholic Beverage (8 x 500ml Cans)

Product Information

The company stated that NIADA seemed to make the general case that high strength alcohol in and of itself caused anti-social behaviour. However, the company stated that if this was true, a well-known vodka brand with a 37.5% ABV would be far more likely to cause excess drinking and anti-social behaviour than Dragon Soop at 7.5% ABV. The company explained that in 2015, Dragon Soop was fully investigated by the Independent Complaints Panel (Panel) under Code rules 3.2(f) and 3.2(h) which it found to not be in breach. The company highlighted that it had received a letter from the Chair of the Panel that there had not been any breach of the Code and that the decision was final. The company concluded by stating that it was important as a self-regulatory body that the Portman Group continued to be seen by all its members as demonstrably fair and transparent. The company noted that the Portman Group was obliged to proceed against a member company or Code Signatory every time a company was accused of a breach of the rules; regardless of who had made the complaint or however credible the complaint was. The company also explained that the Portman Group proceeded with breach procedure, even if the company had previously been cleared of breaching those rules. The company stated that the Panel’s decisions had far reaching consequences, which could potentially lead to a Retailer Alert Bulletin which resulted in the removal of a brand from all retail shelves. The Panel considered the name Venom would be recognised by the majority of UK consumers to mean ‘poison’ in its day-to-day usage and noted this in the context of a beverage which had a relatively high alcohol and caffeine content.

For young people, both large quantities of caffeine and alcohol can be harmful and both of these together in one drink is very concerning. In addition to this, it is worth noting that one can contains more than double the daily recommended limit of caffeine and can exceed the limit of alcohol units daily.

A complaint against the alcoholic drink flavour Venom has been upheld for meaning 'poison' to UK customers, and for its appeal to bravado required to drink it. Commenting on the decision, the Chair of the Independent Complaints Panel, Nicola Williams, said: “Whilst creativity and brands expressing their identities through their products is to be encouraged, care must be taken to avoid associating alcohol with bravado or suggesting a consumer must be daring to drink it. When considering all these elements in combination, the Panel concluded that the name venom, in this particular context, and its presentation, in combination with the aggressive snake imagery, gave the overall impression that the product was marketed mainly on the danger associated with venom, and therefore required bravado to drink it. Fortified with schnapps, it comes in flavours including fruit punch, sour apple, blue raspberry, sherbet, cola, and ­strawberry and lime. The company stated that NIADA could not claim to have knowledge of what ‘most young people’ did, as its day-to-day work and research was conducted with a very specific group of young people, all of whom had serious alcohol or substance abuse issues. The company explained that this research group could not in any way be seen to be representative of the population as a whole. The company argued that any extrapolations about the behaviour and attitudes of the wider population based on research carried out solely with this group would be skewed, misleading and far from impartial.

Sour Apple, Blue Raspberry, Lemon Sherbet, Red Kola, Tropical Fruit Punch and New Venom. Sound refreshing? These are just some flavours of Dragon Soop. And what a cool name!The company then highlighted that in the interim, with the future of Dragon Soop in limbo, SHS Drinks had declared in the trade press that in May 2022 it was launching WKD X, which it said closely mirrored Dragon Soop with an almost identical offering. The company highlighted a quote from the article that stated that WKD X “was developed in conjunction with guidance from industry watchdog the Portman Group.” The company stated that it understood it was against Portman Group rules for SHS Drinks to suggest that the Portman Group had endorsed its brand in this way, even when a producer had consulted with the Portman Group’s Advisory Service prior to launch. The company stated that it understood that Portman Group Code rules prevented disclosure of advice given by the Advisory Service. However, given the comment printed in the article that the “onus on getting the responsibility right” had been noted by WKD, the company stated that it was hard to imagine that SHS Drinks would have gone ahead with launching WKD X in its current form if the Advisory Service had advised that it breached any aspect of the Code.