Toxic Childhood: How The Modern World Is Damaging Our Children And What We Can Do About It

Product Information

The recent growth of the idea of ‘rights of the child’ has given children more of a voice in society. Legislation has emerged to exclude children from a whole range of potentially harmful and dangerous acts.

Mitchell (1971) criticised Parson's male-focused view of the family. By the 1970s, across the western world, a variety of family structures (single parent, lone person, extended, etc.) had emerged to rival the traditional nuclear family.Even Mark Zukerberg wants his daughters to read Dr Suess and play outside rather than use Messenger. Having said that some of her most recent books on child development and education are worth a read. Her most recent publication argues for raising the school starting age to seven! Related Posts

This move ‘fits into’ the general movement towards more child protection. In fact, I think it’s odd that junk food manufactures have been exempt from doing harm to children (by pushing their products onto them) for so long. For more details you might like to visit the ‘ at what age can I’? timeline. More money spent on children There are so many more words of wisdom and warnings about the age our children live in that I can’t recommend this book highly enough. The book confirms the vital role all parents play in our children’s lives and it equips us to recognise and confront the challenges that our children face so that we can ‘detox’ their childhood. Without concerted action, our children’s physical and mental health will continue to deteriorate, with long-term results for UK society that are frankly unthinkable. The changes below happened over a long period of time. The changes discussed start from the 1830s, with the first factory acts restricting child labour, right up to the present day, with the emergence of the ‘rights of the child’, spearheaded by the United Nations. A March of Progress?Point 2 – Adults have fewer children – This enables them to spend more time with each child. The amount time parents spend with children has increased in recent decades. Evaluation – This is not true for all families – Many parents, especially fathers work long hours and cannot see their children. It seems that our technological elites have an intuitive feeling that the products they have created are maybe harmful for children, in the sense that they are addictive, and so take active steps to limit their own children’s use of such products. The 1870 Education Act introduced Education for all children aged 5-12, although this was voluntary at the time.

Childhood lasts an inordinately long time. Experience of it at first hand can be joyful and fulfilling while also labour-intensive, time-consuming, often tedious and increasingly expensive. Those parents coping with these problems in the past without feeling much obvious affection for their young sometimes managed to opt out of any organised form of child rearing at all, leaving their children to grow up as best they could. Parents today do not have this option, unless they want to risk trouble with the law. But out of all these competing claims on time, money and personal space, some British children still manage to have a good enough childhood. Others demonstrably do not, and to the extent that government can help out here, Palmer is right to argue for far more vigorous state intervention. There is for example a clear case now for further protecting children from undesirable commercial pressures. But ultimately the state of childhood cannot be separated from what is also happening to adults at the same time. Improving life for everyone has always been the best way to help children. An awareness of the bigger picture where modern society is concerned would have made this a better all-round study. Outdoor play generally provides children with more freedom than indoor play, allowing children to develop a greater sense of independence and self-reliance than with indoor play which is altogether more controlled and monitored by adults. The next century saw the gradual increasing of the school leaving age and increase in funding for education:One in four teenage girls believe they are suffering from depression, according to a major study by University College London the children’s charity the National Children’s Bureau (NCB). Point 1 – Sue Palmer argues that the family isn’t child centred because of toxic childhood. This is where rapid social and technological changes have led to children being harmed – e.g. fast food/ computer games/ long hours worked by parents. In the split second in my mind that it takes me to decide on my response, it hits me about what is wrong with this book. Whether such technology led socialisation practices end up being detrimental to those children who are exposed to them remains to be seen, but what’s interesting is that so many of the techno-elite are taking steps to limit their own children’s exposure to such technologies. Below are just a few examples: