Pedophilia & Empire: Satan, Sodomy, & the Deep State: Chapter 31: The Hampstead 2 Whistleblowing Kids Expose Satanic Cult’s MK Ritual Abuse-Child Porn Operation

Product Information

As for the very first indication of possible sexual abuse, Mr Christie’s account to Mr Yaohirou is both extraordinary and significant. To entertain suspicions about Mr Dearman from the tone of his voice over a Skype call defies reason. Moreover, senseless assumptions would seem to have been made by Mr Christie and the mother if, in fact, the children had touched the dog and were “ touching each other.” To believe that children who demonstrate curiosity about and touch their own, the dog’s and their sibling’s genital areas must have, or probably have, been sexually abused is plainly ridiculous. It either shows alarming ignorance about normal childish behaviour or, as is much more likely here, wilful determination to distort innocent activities into something sinister and depraved.

Hampstead school at centre of false satanic cult allegation

In the USA, a convicted felon is required to inform Corrections of his place of residence and at times and most states keep registries of such persons so that people are warned and guarded just in case. This too is substantial evidence to support my claims in this post. Warning is not only merited, but should be mandatory by law. If later the charges are proven wrong, then everyone can relax. Warnings are not convictions of a court of law. Below is a list of injuries found in a physical examination of A shown in body maps and the police photographs.” In 2004, two children living in London – P& Q– would make a series of allegations against their father and members of London’s establishment. Establishes the Hampstead Child Therapy Clinic and Course begins. The Hampstead Clinic opens at 12 Maresfield Gardens in 1951 and the Centre is granted charity status. The Clinic is dedicated to clinical practice and research in child analysis, and trains the first generation of child psychotherapists to work in the newly-established NHS.Witness G “does not report any history of constipation or diarrhoea . However he does report that it does often hurt and he has often bled when opening his bowels although this had decreased significantly in the past two months which his sister says is because it is two months since they have seen their father. (the children were also removed from the school). He opens his bowels everyday and reports that his stool is soft. “( a detail that is unfortunately necessary due to later events) Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that. There was an acceptance, on all sides, that it would not have been appropriate for either child to have given oral evidence. Applying the criteria set out in Re W (Children) (Abuse : oral evidence) [2010] UKSC 12, the uncontroversial answer to the essential test – as to whether justice can be done to all parties without further questioning of the child – is that it could. Children, it was alleged, would be anally abused by adult members of the cult using plastic penises or “ willies.”

Timeline: How ‘fantasy’ Hampstead satanic abuse cult

The twelve judges can override such statutory laws, which SHOULD only ever be in place for the fine tuning of Common Law. The twelve judges may base any determination on what is justifiable and in support of their own fellow community standards for the truth and maximum freedom. Accordingly, it becomes necessary to consider how the hearsay evidence comprised within the children’s ABE interviews should be treated. It is admissible as a matter of law. Pursuant to s.4 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995, when estimating the weight to be given to hearsay evidence, the court must have regard to any circumstances from which any inference can reasonably be drawn as to the reliability or otherwise of the evidence. When a judge considers whether to rely on the statements of a child made to others … the following factors, amongst others, are relevant – the child’s age; the context in which the statement had been made; the surrounding circumstances; the child’s previous behaviour; the child’s opportunities to have had knowledge from other sources; any knowledge of a child’s predisposition to tell untruths or fantasize. Information may be used more freely if the subject of the information is not identifiable in any way.I was bemused by Dr Hodes’ suggestion of further psychiatric or psychotherapeutic intervention when she knew that Dr Clare Sturge – one of the leading and most experienced child and adolescent psychiatrists in the country – had already supplied two reports, the first arising out of her assessment of Mr Yaohirou described how he had suggested to DI Cannon that the children should be placed in a safe environment until the case had been sorted out. Mr Yaohirou said he had been unsettled by what he’d heard and believed the children needed some medical or psychological assistance.

Judge: Hampstead Children Were Abused By Mother and Partner

On Monday 8 September, the children were taken by the police on a drive around the area in an unsuccessful attempt to identify specific locations where abusive practices had occurred.The second medical report was done after they retracted the allegations, is this why they now accuse Abe of physical abuse at least. x 0.5cm healing abrasion on the left side of the chin. A alleged that she was hit across the face with a metal spoon while in Morocco.“ The mother interjects, “ Or she listen to our conversation. And she will – ” Mr Christie continues “– use the information, and he does it as well.” Interviewing officers clearly bully false retractions from the children for unknown reasons that can only be sinister.

Hampstead: Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Hampstead: Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual

The report begins with Dr, Hodes outlining her extensive experience in the field. Twenty four years worth.Dr Hodes’ very last report – of 5 February 2015 – was written in response to written questions. She states that “ the overall situation is such that it is my view that the allegations / accounts need to be taken very seriously despite the confusing picture.” Dr Hodes’ view is that whilst it is a matter for the court to decide, she recommends “ a series of more detailed observations and assessments over a longer period of time by a psychiatrist or psychotherapist with a particular interest and expertise in child maltreatment including sexual abuse.”